Perpetual motion on speed
I don't know what the patent examiner who granted this patent was taking, but it must have been pretty strong stuff.
I am almost tempted to think this patent application was meant as an April Fool's Day joke -- I mean, the claims make reference to a crew as an integral part of the described device throughout, so unmanned space probes wouldn't even appear to be covered by the patent, a blatant omission that any patent attorney should have noticed. Oh, and the patent cites a webpage by physics-blogger Sean Carroll -- as well as an H.G. Wells novel!
I am almost tempted to think this patent application was meant as an April Fool's Day joke -- I mean, the claims make reference to a crew as an integral part of the described device throughout, so unmanned space probes wouldn't even appear to be covered by the patent, a blatant omission that any patent attorney should have noticed. Oh, and the patent cites a webpage by physics-blogger Sean Carroll -- as well as an H.G. Wells novel!
Labels: weirdness
posted by Georg @ 11:45 AM
6 Comments:
Clean energy
The entire world is looking for a source of clean energy. I have discovered a certain paradox basing on which a machine called METOZ can be built which by harnessing the gravitation of our EARTH can produce clean energy.
The energy producing process is demonstrated in:
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/paradox.html
and can be very easily confirmed by an experiment.
I am also in possession of a set of calculations which prove that the METOZ machine:
1/ does not consume water / 39 A5-pictures /;
2/ does not consume compressed air / 39 A5-pictures /;
3/ produces energy to the outside = 4 839 kGm during a „swing cycle” /39 A5-pictures /;
/ this is a „weight cycle” = the centre of gravity of the water in the METOZ machine sinks ( downward movement ) /
4/ energy is produced / released to the outside = 44 600 kGm during the „straightening cycle” / 39 A5-pictures /.
/ this is a “pressure cycle” = the water mass centre of gravity inside the METOZ machine travels upwards (upward movement) /
Features: 1/; 2/; 3/; 4/, of the machine owing to appropriate dimensions of individual elements of the lever mechanism.
The METOZ has an even-arm lever of a 1.72 m length. The centre of gravity of the lever lies beneath the lever suspension point. The METOZ is equipped with two cylinders of a 1.6 m diameter each. Piston sidewalls do not contact directly with cylinder walls. The lever swing changes between and .
Figures ( 3 x 13 x 4 = 156 ) present temporary, consecutive action situations at intervals of . The middle figure presents the machine and the side figures the position of the left and right cylinder and the mathematical description of these situations.
In the past I have made two models, which confirmed the legitimacy of my theoretical assumptions concerning the METOZ machine. I have got photographs.
I am looking for a person who would be interested in my invention. I can offer ample information. I look forward to hearing from you.
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html
13 - 03 -2005 Gdynia, Polska Zygmunt Orłowski
P.S. The term “gravitational paradox” use in this description relates to the mathematical and physical description of the action of the METOZ-machine.
THE EARTH GRAVITATION CAN BE THE SOURCE OF CLEAN ENERGY.
Comment for METOZ
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By
Orlowski Zygmunt
Poland 2005
index html
Comments concerning machine "METOZ"
"METOZ" is able to realize the cycle "deflection" and the cycle "straighening." Both cycles are in accordance with current physic's laws. "METOZ" as machine can not work and hand over the energy because it would be inconsonant to the law of conservation of energy.
I propose to execute the following intelectual process:
we have found ourselves in the Europe of XVII century. We know the trigonometry in the scope of being occured for "METOZ." We know what is the even-arm lever and moment of force too. Just appeears Mr. Baise Pascal / 1623--1662/ and he publishes his hydraulics law with adequated experiment. All thinkers are sure that this law is correct and quite real. This time someone invents machine "METOZ". Now turn up the following questions:
1/ why the implementation of the cycle "deflection" is impossible?
2/ why the implementation of the cycle "straightening" is impossible?Both groups: opponents and followers of bulding "METOZ" live in XVII--th century and they not know that:
a/ the idea of an "energy" will be introduced into science scarlerly in mid. of XIX century,
b/ the law of conservation of the energy will be exist scarlerly after 1847 y.
QVESTION!!!
WHAT KIND OF RATIONALY ENTERELY / ARGUMENT/ CAN BE DREAMED UP THE OPPONENTS OF BUILDING THE MACHINE "METOZ' IN XVII CENTURY.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Anonymous,
the person who applied for the above-mentioned patent at least relied on their misunderstanding of fairly advanced concepts from modern physics to arrive at their incorrect claims. Your perpetual motion machine is based only on your misunderstanding of elementary classical mechanics, plus the common crank notion that "mathematics is a fraud, the real world is different". It isn't, and we know that from centuries of experience.
Best wishes,
Georg
I have dreamed the solution to creating a perpetual motion machine. My partner and I are prototyping once we agree on the scale...
"Perpetuity" will work.
Dear Anonymous,
It is truly fascinating what kinds of readers and comments one can attract simply by putting the "perpetual motion" on one's blog. You may rest assured that no matter what scale you use and no matter what you call it, your perpetual motion engine won't work.
More importantly, you should realise that dreams cannot replace insights into physical law. I have dreamt, among other things, of a method to travel faster than the speed of light by flapping one's arms; as a (sleeping) dream that is perfectly fine -- one doesn't pick one's dreams. But anyone who tries to transport that kind of dream into waking reality is just plain delusional.
Best wishes,
Georg
It is something METOZ about.
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/not_for_idiot.html
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/cycle_str.html
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/work_deflection.html
http://www.metozor.nets.pl/metoz.html
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_exper.html
Thanks for understanding.
P.S.
The conception of an energy is discreate one to the same as a imbecility. No one has seen the energy and no one has seen the imbecility. We are able to observe results of the energy and imbecility. At present we have got to few energy because we have got to much imbecility.
Thank you for your time and interest.
Anonymous said:"We are able to observe results of the energy and imbecility."
The imbecility of people who try to build perpetual motion machines is indeed easy to observe.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home